Read Dr Ruickbie on witchcraft and magic in Paranormal magazine.
What is Witchcraft?
That's what this website is here to find out. Witchology.com is the website of WICA - the Witchcraft Information Centre and Archive - founded in 1999 by Dr Leo Ruickbie as a research and education provider specialising in the areas of Witchcraft, Wicca, Paganism, Magic (Magick) and the Occult. We have been online continuously since 2000.
WICA Recommended by:
Presumably Buffy was born with her powers, but we are not all that lucky. Study for your diploma in witchcraft at http://www.wica.org.uk. (The Guardian, 2001)
| Help spread the message by tweeting Witchology.com and sharing our info on witchcraft and Wicca with your friends. |
From Witchology.com Visitors:
This [Witchcraft Out of the Shadows] is so great! It was just what I was hoping for! You have done so much for all of us! Thanks, many times over! (Rose, 27th March, 2005)
About Leo Ruickbie's Books:
I highly recomend Witchcraft out of the Shadows to anyone with the slightest interest in the "Craft". (Blogcritics.com, 2004)
Get Involved with WICA:
Want to investigate magic (Magick), review a grimoire, or write for this website? We are looking for people to join us in our work. Whatever your level of skill or experience you can help.
Other Opportunities at WICA:
Want to make some money? We'll help you do it now.
Free Witchcraft Newsletter:
Plus special offers, secret events and a free gift! Enter your e-mail address and click the button to get the free newsletter.
Spread the Word about WICA:
Search Witchology:
Witchcraft to Go:
 Unicorn
Click here for more designs
|
Witchology Team Projects
If you are already a member of the Witchology Team, then this is the page just for you, with ideas, guidelines and suggestions on how to help out at Witchology.com.
Witchology Writing Guide
Introduction to Writing
Writing is simply
the transfer of thought to paper; both writing and thinking are done in
words. To be able to write clearly is to be able to think clearly and vice-versa.
The purpose of writing is to communicate information, ideas, opinions,
or feelings to other people. Unless the other people "get the message"
you intend to convey, you have failed to communicate effectively. Thus,
as a writer, you have two major tasks. The first and most difficult task
it to establish clearly in your own mind what you want to say. The second
task it to find the most effective way to convey your message to the reader.
Listed below are tips and strategies for accomplishing both tasks effectively.
The Manuscript
The Title
Ideally, a title
should say a great deal in only a few words. It should not only capture
the reader's attention but in some way express the whole work including
its themes and outcome. To this end:
- Include the key terms in the title.
- Give a specific indication of subject matter.
The Introduction
An introduction,
like a title, should engage the reader's attention and interest right away,
in the opening sentence if possible. You need not resort to flashy
rhetorical tricks, but you should say something direct and interesting
about your thesis. Be helpful to your reader by explaining immediately
what he or she is about to read andy why, roughly how the argument will
develop, what the pitfalls are, and how the piece relates to the field
as a whole. To this end:
- Interpret the title, if necessary.
- Give the thesis statement followed by the
main discussion points and the order in which the reader will encounter
them.
- Identify the scope and limitations of your
project.
- Define any terms, concepts or theories critical
to your work.
- List potential problems such as a lack of
sources or information, biased sources, incomplete evidence, etc.
- Indicate how the topic relates to the field of study as a whole.
The Main Body
Of the two major
tasks facing any writer, the first task of thinking clearly and critically
can be greatly aided by an outline. Arrange your information into
a logical and understandable sequence of main points that support your
thesis statement. To this end:
- Keep your main points separate and follow
each with a summary statement to remind the reader how said point relates
to the topic as a whole.
- Follow each main point with your evidence
for it (examples, quotations, proofs, sources, etc.)
- If arguing a general point, give the facts
first and then the generalization followed by a summary statement.
- If arguing a specific point, give the less
specific information first and end with the most specific followed by a
summary statement.
- If proving something, give the weaker evidence
first and end with the strongest followed by a summary statement.
- If disproving something, outline the supposed
"proofs" first and end with the disproof followed by a summary statement.
The writer's second task
of effective communication is eased by establishing two things: a
clear idea of the intended audience, and a durable and distinctive personal
style of writing and thinking. Most "ideal readers" should be reasonably
intelligent and liberally educated individuals, not specialists in your
subject matter. As for good writing, style and content are inseparable.
Style pervade a writer's whole work, from the choice and definition of
a subject through the research and in its final literary presentation.
Write with accuracy, clarity, conciseness, objectivity, and vigor.
While this course is not a study in English composition, it is a fact that
any idea you wish to express is only as effective as the language skill
used to express it. It is difficult for a reader to understand and learn
from a paper when assaulted by a plethora of misspelled words, incorrectly
punctuated sentences, misplaced modifiers, and awkward sentence construction.
To this end:
- Use the simple past tense for the
simple reason that your subjects lived and died in the past. Even though
you may have the written evidence of their lives in front of you now, they
speak to you from the past.
- Use the active voice rather than
the passive. Use clear, action verbs whenever possible. Avoid the "to be"
verbs (is, are, were, was, am, etc.) except where you intend and require
an equation or definition. Avoid limp, weak verbs (seems, appears, try,
etc.). These verbs indicate nothing that can be evaluated clearly. They
are transparent attempts to avoid making statements for which one can be
held accountable.
- Be direct, which means economical
with your word choice.
- Be specific rather than general or
abstract, employing "first-degree" words which immediately bring an image
to mind (e.g. face), rather than second degree word which require translation
(e.g. countenance).
- Refer to people, not books or sources;
books do not talk.
- Avoid unspecific referents (this,
it, they).
- Conceal your "scaffolding." Avoid statements like
"This
paper will prove...", or "as I argue below" and similar references to
your own act of writing. Just prove and argue your points without fanfare.
Scaffolding is only acceptable in an abstract.
- Avoid tense/number agreement errors.
Verbs and pronouns agree in number and tense with any nouns to which they
refer. Lax standards in spoken English are not acceptable in formal writing.
- Avoid textual references to yourself.
"I" is at least more honest that "we", but equally obtrusive. The subject
of history is people in the past, not the historian. The reader wants the
finished product, not a diary about the process of making it.
- Minimize the use of "very". Historical
evidence is seldom complete enough to justify such a fine distinction,
and a properly chosen adverb or adjective makes the qualification unnecessary.
- Do not patronize, lecture to, or push
the reader around. Let the reader notice and decide what he or
she thinks is important.
- Integrate quotations - your accessible
proof - into your own prose, and vary your introductions. So and so said...is
boring. The first time you introduce a speaker give his or her full
name and a brief identification. Do not be afraid to use parts of
quotations rather than whole sentences, or to introduce quotations in the
middle or at the end as well as at the beginning.
- Re-work awkwardly worded sentences.
- Avoid contractions (e.g. don't, prof,
they've) in historical writing. It is a semi-formal writing style inappropriate
for professional writers.
- In the text centuries must be written out
in lower case letters: "the seventeenth century" not "the 17th century."
If the date is a modifier, it is hyphenated as if one word: "fifteenth-century
chivalry." Decades do not get an apostrophe: "1650s".
- Catholic clergyman have ecclesiastical titles
(e.g., Father Le Clercq) whereas Protestant clergyman have honorific
titles (e.g., the Reverend Bill Johnson).
- Ellipses (...) are not needed in a quotation
unless you omit something from the middle or end of a complete sentence
that begins with a capitalized word. Ellipses warn the reader that something
(perhaps vital) is missing. You may use any fragment of a quotation without
them at the front and back because the lack of a capitalized first word
announces its incompleteness.
- In anything shorter than a book, a bibliography
is unnecessary. Footnotes in which full bibliographic information is given are sufficient.
- Always use citations. Anytime you
assert a "fact" that is not truly general knowledge you must provide a
citation from a scholastically reputable source. A general rule is that
if you can find the fact in three or more sources it is considered an established
fact an need not be supported by citation. However, when in doubt, err
on the side of caution. Anytime you use a quotation you must provide the
name of the author and your source. Anytime you borrow an idea or a mode
of expression from an author you must provide both the name of the author
and the source in which you found the expression.
- Proof-reading is the crucial last
act of writing. Do it with a dictionary: When in doubt, look it up. Effort
in this area will reduce the number of misspelled words and wrong
words which are correctly spelled words used inappropriately. Omitted
words and/or sentence fragments are often the result of editing and re-writing.
Avoid these errors by re-reading your paper and making sure the new, "corrected"
sentence makes sense.
The Conclusion
A conclusion should
actually conclude your argument or presentation, not merely restate earlier
material, especially the introduction. Although no new material should
be introduced, a conclusion should present a new perspective on the points
already covered or suggest future directions for thinking about the subject.
To this end:
- Do not introduce new material. Information
that appears vital to your end product should be included in the main body
of the paper, not in the last few paragraphs.
- Remind the reader of your thesis statment,
the main point of your discussion and their implications, as well as how
the topic relates to the field or course as a whole.
- Make a conclusion; answer the question at
hand (i.e. render a final verdict).
General Requirements
In order to create useful scholarly habits and give you the best chance of ensuring that your
work is given the credit it deserves, observe the following:
- All assignments must be word-processed.
- All assignment must be submitted one-and-a-half times or double spaced with one-inch margins on all four sides.
- All assignments must be submitted digitally.
- All assignments must have either a title
or the assignment quoted in full at the beginning of the paper.
- All assignments must have the writer's name
and date appearing in the upper right-hand corner of the paper. Do
not include any superfulous information.
- All assignments must be footnoted and/or
referenced via endnotes, and include bibliographies of works cited.
- All assignments must have the word count
typed on a separate line well below the text at the end of the paper.
|